Industrial Chemistry

Ostwald Process (Nitric Acid)

Three steps from ammonia to fertilizer — and to TNT

The Ostwald process makes nitric acid by catalytically oxidizing ammonia in three stages: NH₃ → NO → NO₂ → HNO₃. A platinum-rhodium gauze at 850 °C drives the first step at over 95% selectivity. The world makes about 70 million tonnes of HNO₃ a year — most of it for fertilizer.

  • InventorWilhelm Ostwald, 1902
  • CatalystPt-Rh gauze (90:10)
  • Burner temperature~850 °C
  • Step-1 selectivity to NO95–98%
  • Contact time on gauze~1 ms
  • Global output~70 Mt HNO₃/yr

Interactive visualization

Press play, or step through manually. The visualization is yours to drive — try it before reading on.

Open visualization fullscreen ↗

Watch the 60-second explainer

A condensed visual walkthrough — narrated, captioned, under a minute.

How the process works

The Ostwald process turns ammonia into nitric acid in three sequential reactions, each in its own equipment at its own optimal temperature. Step 1 wants high temperature for catalyst activity, step 2 wants low temperature for equilibrium yield, step 3 wants water and a tall absorption column. Real plants run as one heat-integrated train.

┌──────────┐      ┌──────────┐      ┌──────────┐      ┌──────────┐
│  NH₃     │  +O₂ │   NO     │  +O₂ │   NO₂    │  +H₂O│   HNO₃   │
│  (g)     │ ───► │   (g)    │ ───► │   (g)    │ ───► │   (aq)   │
└──────────┘  Pt  └──────────┘ cool └──────────┘ tower└──────────┘
              -Rh                   chamber          absorption
              gauze                 oxidation        + tail-gas
              850 °C                ~50–150 °C       ~25 °C
              ~1 ms                 minutes          residence ~30 min

Behind the scenes, this is the same nitrogen that sat as inert N₂ in the atmosphere — fixed by Haber-Bosch into NH₃, then walked up the oxidation ladder by Ostwald. Together the two processes are the chemical engine of the green revolution.

Step 1 — catalytic ammonia burning

4 NH₃(g) + 5 O₂(g)  ──Pt-Rh, 850 °C──►  4 NO(g) + 6 H₂O(g)
                                          ΔH = −907 kJ/mol

NH₃ and air (1:9 by volume, 10% NH₃) flow downward through a stack of 10–30 woven Pt-Rh gauzes, each ~80 µm wire diameter, 1024 mesh per cm². Contact time is roughly 1 millisecond — long enough to make NO, too short for NO to back-decompose to N₂. The reaction's own exothermicity holds the gauze at 850 °C; plants pre-heat with a hydrogen flame at startup, then NH₃ + O₂ feed alone sustains temperature.

Selectivity to NO is 95–98% on fresh gauzes. The remaining 2–5% goes to N₂O (greenhouse gas) and N₂ (back where the nitrogen started). Higher temperatures raise NO yield but accelerate Pt evaporation; lower ones risk coking from organic NH₃ contaminants. 850 °C is the sweet spot.

Step 2 — gas-phase NO oxidation

2 NO(g) + O₂(g)  ⇌  2 NO₂(g)        ΔH = −114 kJ/mol

Hot exit gas leaves the burner at ~850 °C. Heat exchangers pre-heat absorption-tower air and raise process steam, cooling the stream to ~150 °C and then to ~50 °C. Cooling matters because 2 NO + O₂ → 2 NO₂ is exothermic — high temperature drives it backward.

The reaction needs no catalyst. A few minutes of residence in an "oxidation drum" or the cooler tubing itself converts > 90% of NO to NO₂. The remainder gets re-oxidized by air injected later.

Step 3 — water absorption

3 NO₂(g) + H₂O(l)  ⇌  2 HNO₃(aq) + NO(g)        ΔH = −136 kJ/mol

NO₂ contacts water in a packed or sieve-tray tower. Each pass produces 2 HNO₃ per 3 NO₂ plus regenerated NO. Air injected at the bottom re-oxidizes NO back to NO₂, recycling it up the column. 30+ trays push conversion to the equilibrium ceiling.

Dual-pressure plants run absorption at 8–14 bar to push equilibrium toward HNO₃. Output sits at 50–65 wt%; the 95% concentrated-acid explosives grade comes from extractive distillation with H₂SO₄ to break the 68% azeotrope.

Worked numbers — feed to product

Take 1 tonne of NH₃ feed (58 800 mol):

  • Step 1 (selectivity 96%): 0.96 × 58 800 = 56 450 mol NO produced. The other 4% becomes ~2350 mol N₂ and ~50 mol N₂O.
  • Step 2 (~95% conversion): 53 600 mol NO₂.
  • Step 3 (after recycle, ~98% absorption): 35 000 mol HNO₃ (3 NO₂ → 2 HNO₃, with NO recycled).
  • Net HNO₃ output: 35 000 × 63 g/mol ≈ 2.2 t HNO₃ per tonne NH₃ — the standard plant ratio.
  • Energy: Step 1 generates ~907 kJ/mol NH₃. After heat recovery, plants are net steam exporters by ~0.7 t per tonne HNO₃.
  • Pt loss: ~150 mg per tonne HNO₃ at modern recovery rates. A 1000 tpd plant loses ~50 kg of Pt per year.

Full reaction-flow diagram

      Haber-Bosch          Ostwald (this article)
       ─────────         ─────────────────────────
  N₂  ──►  NH₃   →   NH₃ + air
                          │
                  Pt-Rh gauze, 850 °C
                          │
                          ▼
                       NO (g)  ───┐
                                  │ + O₂, cooler
                          ▼       │
                       NO₂ (g) ◄──┘
                          │
                          │  + H₂O in absorber
                          ▼
                      HNO₃ (aq)
                          │
                          ▼
            ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
            ▼                           ▼
    NH₄NO₃ fertilizer           explosives
   (75% of output)         (TNT, RDX, ANFO,
                            rocket oxidizer)

Stages compared at a glance

Step 1: NH₃ → NOStep 2: NO → NO₂Step 3: NO₂ → HNO₃Tail-gas treatment
EquipmentPt-Rh gauze burnerCooler / oxidation drumPacked absorption towerSCR / N₂O abatement bed
Temperature~850 °C50–150 °C20–40 °C250–400 °C
Pressure1–10 bar1–10 bar8–14 bar1 bar
Residence time~1 msMinutes30+ min0.1–1 s
CatalystPt-Rh (90:10) gauzeNone — gas phaseNone — absorptionFe-zeolite or Co/Ce
Conversion95–98% to NO~90% to NO₂~98% absorbed (recycle)70–90% N₂O destroyed
What kills itPt loss, NH₃ slipHot-spot re-equilibrationNO breakthrough at topSOx poisoning

Real-world plants and history

  • Wilhelm Ostwald, 1902 patent. The German chemist (1909 Nobel Prize) demonstrated the gauze burner in his Leipzig laboratory. His insight: a fast surface reaction at the right temperature beats thermodynamic equilibrium because the reverse decomposition can't keep up.
  • Norsk Hydro, Notodden & Rjukan. Norway's giant Birkeland-Eyde plants on cheap hydropower were converted to Ostwald in the 1920s once cheap NH₃ from Haber-Bosch arrived.
  • Modern dual-pressure plants. Yara, ThyssenKrupp, KBR license slightly different versions. Burner at low pressure (4–5 bar), absorption at high pressure (10–12 bar) — the compromise between selectivity and absorption.
  • Largest single trains. Yara's Porsgrunn (Norway) and CFI's Sluiskil (Netherlands) each push past 2000 tpd. A typical greenfield plant is 500–1500 tpd.
  • WWI dual-use chemistry. Germany's nitric-acid supply switched from Chilean saltpetre to synthetic in 1914–1916. The Allied blockade had cut imports; without the NH₃→HNO₃ pipeline German artillery would have run dry.
  • Birkeland-Eyde, 1903. Direct N₂ + O₂ → NO via a 3000 °C electric arc. ~60 MWh per tonne HNO₃, only viable on free hydroelectricity. Survived in Norway until ~1940.

Variants and edge cases

  • Mono-pressure plants. All steps at one pressure (4 bar low or 10 bar high). Cheaper capex, lower yield. Common in plants < 500 tpd.
  • Concentrated nitric acid. Direct-strong-nitric (DSN) variants use cryogenic O₂ and 50% H₂O₂ to push absorption past the 68% water azeotrope without distillation.
  • N₂O abatement. Secondary Fe-zeolite or Co/Ce beds downstream of the gauze decompose 2 N₂O → 2 N₂ + O₂. Modern European plants emit < 1 kg N₂O per tonne HNO₃, vs ~10 kg unmitigated.
  • SCR tail-gas treatment. Selective catalytic reduction with NH₃ over V-W-Ti destroys remaining NOx in the exhaust to < 25 ppmv.
  • Plasma and electrocatalytic alternatives. Active research aims to skip Haber-Bosch + Ostwald entirely by reducing N₂ + H₂O electrochemically to NO₃⁻. Faradaic efficiencies are still in single digits.

Common pitfalls and misconceptions

  • "Higher gauze temperature is always better." Selectivity to NO peaks near 850 °C. Beyond ~950 °C, Pt vaporization accelerates and gauze life collapses to weeks.
  • "NO₂ absorbs neatly into water." The 3 NO₂ + H₂O ⇌ 2 HNO₃ + NO equilibrium recycles a third of the nitrogen back. Without air re-injection, conversion stalls.
  • "Tail gas is just NOx." It also contains N₂O, often the largest CO₂-equivalent emitter in the plant.
  • "Ostwald and Haber-Bosch are independent." Almost no Ostwald plant runs alone — they sit adjacent to a Haber-Bosch plant because shipping liquid NH₃ is awkward and heat integration is natural.
  • "Pt-Rh gauzes are sintered solid." They're woven wire, not pellets — high surface area, low mass-transfer resistance, and ~99.5% Pt-recoverable when retired.
  • "All HNO₃ goes to fertilizer." ~75% does, mostly as ammonium nitrate. The other 25% goes to caprolactam (nylon-6), TNT, plating chemistry, and rocket-oxidizer fuming acid.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the Ostwald process need a platinum-rhodium gauze?

Without a catalyst, NH₃ in air burns straight to N₂ and H₂O — useless for nitric acid. The Pt-Rh gauze (typically 90:10 Pt:Rh, woven at 1024 mesh per cm²) selectively oxidizes NH₃ to NO at >95% yield, but only if the contact time is short enough (~1 ms) that NO doesn't have time to decompose back to N₂. Rhodium toughens the gauze against thermal creep at 850 °C; pure Pt would melt-creep within weeks.

Why does the second-step gas have to cool down before oxidation?

2 NO + O₂ → 2 NO₂ is exothermic and equilibrium-limited — high temperature pushes it back to the left. The hot gas leaving the Pt-Rh gauze is cooled (typically with a heat exchanger that pre-warms the incoming air, recovering most of the energy) to ~150 °C before oxidation, then to ~50 °C for absorption.

Why is N₂O emission a big deal in nitric acid plants?

About 0.3–1.5% of NH₃ feed escapes as nitrous oxide (N₂O) — a 273× more potent greenhouse gas than CO₂. Modern plants install secondary catalysts (Co/Ce or Fe-zeolite beds) downstream of the gauze to decompose N₂O back to N₂ and O₂, cutting emissions by 70–90%. The CDM market has paid plants in India and China to retrofit these for ~$0.50/t-CO₂eq abated.

How does Ostwald compare to Birkeland-Eyde?

Birkeland-Eyde (1903, Norway) ran a 3000 °C electric arc through air to oxidize N₂ directly to NO. It worked, but consumed ~60 MWh per tonne of HNO₃ — only viable next to free hydropower. Ostwald (1902, patented 1908) starts from NH₃ already made by Haber-Bosch and uses ~3 MWh per tonne. Ostwald killed Birkeland-Eyde by the 1930s; Norsk Hydro converted its fjord plants over.

What is concentrated vs dilute nitric acid output?

Standard absorption towers produce "weak" acid at 50–65 wt%. To get concentrated (95–99% white-fuming nitric acid), you have to break the 68 wt% azeotrope — typically by extractive distillation with sulfuric acid or magnesium nitrate brine. Most fertilizer-grade output stays dilute; explosives grade (Pentolite, RDX) needs the concentrated.

What's the catalyst lifetime and what kills it?

A Pt-Rh gauze pack runs 6–12 months between changes. Three things age it. First, Pt vapour pressure at 850 °C is non-negligible — Pt slowly evaporates, and a downstream Pd-Au "catchment gauze" recovers about 70% of it. Second, mechanical creep deforms the wires. Third, sulfur or chloride trace contamination in NH₃ poisons surface sites. A 100-tpd plant loses ~15 g of Pt per day at modern recovery rates.