Quantum Physics

de Broglie Wavelength

λ = h/p — every particle has a matter wave with wavelength inversely proportional to momentum

Louis de Broglie's 1924 hypothesis — every particle has an associated wave with wavelength λ = h/p (Planck's constant divided by momentum). Confirmed for electrons (Davisson-Germer 1927), neutrons, atoms, even large molecules. Foundation of wave-particle duality and quantum mechanics. Won de Broglie the 1929 Nobel Prize. Why electron microscopes can resolve atoms.

  • Equationλ = h / p
  • For non-relativistic particleλ = h / (m·v) = h / √(2m·KE)
  • For photonλ = h/p = h·c/E (massless, E = pc)
  • ProposedLouis de Broglie, 1924 (PhD thesis!)
  • ConfirmedDavisson-Germer experiment (electrons on Ni crystal), 1927
  • Nobel Prizede Broglie, 1929

Interactive visualization

Press play, or step through manually. The visualization is yours to drive — try it before reading on.

Open visualization fullscreen ↗

Watch the 60-second explainer

A condensed visual walkthrough — narrated, captioned, under a minute.

de Broglie wavelength

λ = h / p

For non-relativistic particle of mass m at velocity v: p = mv, so:

λ = h / (m · v)

For particle with kinetic energy KE: p = √(2m·KE), so:

λ = h / √(2m·KE)

For photon: massless, p = E/c, so λ = hc/E.

Wavelengths of various particles

Particlem, vλ
Electron at 100 eV9.11e-31 kg, ~6e6 m/s0.12 nm
Electron in TEM (100 kV)~10⁸ m/s (relativistic)~4 pm
Thermal electron (300 K)~10⁵ m/s~7 nm
Hydrogen atom (300 K)1.67e-27, ~2700 m/s~1 Å
Buckyball C60 (slow)1.2e-24, ~200 m/s~3 pm
Bullet (10 g at 800 m/s)0.01 kg~10⁻³⁴ m
Tennis ball (60 g at 50 m/s)0.06 kg~10⁻³⁴ m
Person walking70 kg, 1 m/s~10⁻³⁵ m

Heavy or fast objects → tiny λ → utterly negligible quantum effects.

JavaScript — de Broglie calculations

const h = 6.626e-34;
const m_e = 9.11e-31;
const m_n = 1.675e-27;  // neutron
const m_p = 1.673e-27;  // proton
const eV = 1.602e-19;

function deBroglie(mass, velocity) {
  return h / (mass * velocity);
}

function deBroglieFromKE(mass, KE_J) {
  return h / Math.sqrt(2 * mass * KE_J);
}

// Various electrons
console.log(`Thermal electron: ${(deBroglie(m_e, 1e5) * 1e9).toFixed(2)} nm`);
console.log(`100 eV electron: ${(deBroglieFromKE(m_e, 100*eV) * 1e9).toFixed(2)} nm`);
console.log(`10 keV electron: ${(deBroglieFromKE(m_e, 10000*eV) * 1e9).toFixed(3)} nm`);

// For relativistic electron, need full formula. Approximate non-relativistic up to ~50 keV.
function deBroglieRelativistic(KE_J, rest_mass = m_e) {
  // E_total = KE + m·c² ; p² = (E_total/c)² - (m·c)²
  const c_speed = 3e8;
  const E_total = KE_J + rest_mass * c_speed * c_speed;
  const p = Math.sqrt(E_total*E_total / (c_speed*c_speed) - rest_mass*rest_mass*c_speed*c_speed);
  return h / p;
}

// 100 keV electron (relativistic correction matters)
console.log(`100 keV electron (relativistic): ${(deBroglieRelativistic(100000*eV) * 1e12).toFixed(2)} pm`);

// Neutron at 0.025 eV (thermal)
console.log(`Thermal neutron: ${(deBroglieFromKE(m_n, 0.025*eV) * 1e10).toFixed(2)} Å`);
// ~1.8 Å — perfect for crystal diffraction

// Macroscopic object — to confirm utterly small
console.log(`Baseball at 30 m/s: ${deBroglie(0.145, 30).toExponential(2)} m`);  // 10⁻³⁴

// Microscope resolution comparison
function diffractionLimit(wavelength) {
  return wavelength / 2;  // very rough
}

console.log(`Visible light (550 nm) limit: ${(diffractionLimit(550e-9) * 1e9).toFixed(0)} nm`);
console.log(`100 kV electron limit: ${(diffractionLimit(deBroglieRelativistic(100000*eV)) * 1e12).toFixed(2)} pm`);

// What v does an electron need to have λ = 1 nm?
function velocityForWavelength(mass, wavelength) {
  return h / (mass * wavelength);
}

console.log(`Electron for 1 nm λ: ${velocityForWavelength(m_e, 1e-9).toExponential(2)} m/s`);
// ~7e5 m/s — about 0.2% c, non-relativistic

Where de Broglie wavelength matters

  • Quantum mechanics foundation. Schrödinger's equation describes evolution of matter waves.
  • Electron microscopy. Resolves atoms by exploiting electrons' tiny λ.
  • Neutron diffraction. Crystal structure, magnetic materials, polymers.
  • Atomic interferometry. Measure gravity, rotation, fundamental constants with cold atoms.
  • X-ray crystallography. X-rays have de Broglie wavelengths ~atomic spacing.
  • Quantum dots. Confinement at de Broglie scale gives discrete energy levels.
  • Cold atom experiments. Ultracold atoms have macroscopically large λ — Bose-Einstein condensates show wave behavior.

Common mistakes

  • Using non-relativistic formula at high speeds. p = m·v fails when v approaches c. Use p = γm·v or full relativistic formulas.
  • Confusing momentum and velocity. p ≠ m·v in relativity. λ = h/p, not h/(mv) at high speeds.
  • Thinking wave is "physical." de Broglie wave is a probability amplitude, not a physical oscillation. |Ψ|² gives where you'd find the particle.
  • Treating macroscopic objects as quantum. Their λ is so small (10⁻³⁵ m or less) that quantum effects are invisible. Only quantum at atomic scales.
  • Using just thermal velocity. For room-T thermal motion, KE = (3/2)kT. λ depends on mass (heavy molecules → smaller λ at same T).
  • Forgetting massless photons. For light, λ = h/p where p = E/c. Photon de Broglie reduces to standard λ = c/f relation.

Frequently asked questions

How did de Broglie come up with this?

His PhD thesis (1924), inspired by Einstein's photons. Reasoning: if waves (light) can have particle properties (photons), maybe particles can have wave properties. He proposed every particle has λ = h/p. Bold guess; even his examiners weren't sure. Einstein supported it; Schrödinger built on it; experiments confirmed it three years later.

How is λ = h/p verified for electrons?

Davisson-Germer (1927) — fired electrons at nickel crystal, observed diffraction pattern (like X-rays). Diffraction angles matched de Broglie wavelength exactly. Independent: G.P. Thomson (1928) showed electron diffraction through thin foils. Won Davisson and Thomson the 1937 Nobel — ironically, J.J. Thomson (G.P.'s father) had won earlier showing electrons are particles!

Why is the electron's wavelength much shorter than a baseball's?

λ = h/p. Electron tiny mass + slow → relatively large p but still small. Baseball: huge mass × moderate velocity → enormous p → tiny λ. Specifically — electron at 1 m/s: λ ≈ 1 mm. Baseball at 30 m/s: λ ≈ 10⁻³⁴ m. Quantum effects need wavelength comparable to system size — only matters for tiny particles.

How is this used in electron microscopy?

Visible light limited by diffraction to ~200 nm resolution. Electrons accelerated through 100 kV have λ ~ 4 pm — 100,000× shorter than light. Electron microscopes resolve individual atoms (down to ~50 pm with aberration correction). Critical for materials science, biology, semiconductor research.

What about neutrons?

Neutrons have de Broglie waves too — used in neutron diffraction for crystal/molecular structure. Particularly good for: locating hydrogen atoms (X-rays don't see them well), magnetic structure (sensitive to electron spin), polymers and biology. Neutron sources at facilities like ORNL, ILL.

Can large objects show wave behavior?

Yes, in principle. Recent experiments — interference observed for molecules with thousands of atoms (~25,000 amu). At molecular scale, very challenging (needs cooling to slow them, vacuum, careful experimental setup). For macroscopic objects, λ is so small (10⁻³⁴ m for baseball) that quantum effects unobservable.

How does this relate to Schrödinger's equation?

de Broglie waves are matter waves; Schrödinger (1926) gave them an equation — Ψ describes the matter wave; |Ψ|² gives probability density. Schrödinger's equation predicts all atomic structure, chemistry, solid state physics. de Broglie's hypothesis was the seed; Schrödinger built the full theory.