Optics
Goos-Hänchen Shift: The Lateral Beam Displacement at Total Internal Reflection
Shine a laser into a glass prism so steeply that not a single photon escapes out the back — perfect total internal reflection — and the beam still comes out about one wavelength (roughly half a micrometer of visible light) too far down the surface. That tiny sideways slip, on the order of 0.1 to 1 μm, is the Goos-Hänchen shift: the reflected beam leaves the interface displaced along the surface from the point geometrical optics predicts.
Named for Fritz Goos and Hilda Hänchen, who measured it in 1947, the effect is a direct fingerprint of the evanescent wave that hovers in the "forbidden" second medium during total internal reflection. Rather than bouncing off a mathematical plane, the light dives briefly into the rarer medium, glides forward, and re-emerges — producing a displacement that depends on wavelength, polarization, and how close the angle sits to the critical angle.
- TypeLateral (spatial) beam shift at reflection
- RegimeTotal internal reflection, θ > θc
- Predicted / ObservedNewton 1704; Picht 1929; Goos & Hänchen 1947
- Key equationD = -(λ/2π)·(dδ/dθ)
- Typical scale~0.1-1 μm (order of one wavelength)
- Observed inLight, microwaves, neutrons, acoustics, plasmonics
Interactive visualization
Press play, or step through manually. The visualization is yours to drive — try it before reading on.
Watch the 60-second explainer
A condensed visual walkthrough — narrated, captioned, under a minute.
What the Goos-Hänchen Shift Is
Point a collimated light beam at the inside face of a glass block at an angle steeper than the critical angle θc = arcsin(1/n). Geometric optics says the beam reflects perfectly, its virtual point of reflection sitting exactly where the incident ray strikes the interface. Experiment says otherwise: the reflected beam emerges laterally displaced by a distance D, sliding forward along the surface in the plane of incidence.
This is the Goos-Hänchen (GH) shift. Crucially, it appears only for a bounded beam — a real beam is a superposition of many plane-wave components spanning a small range of angles. It is not a change in the beam's direction; the reflected beam travels parallel to the geometric prediction but is offset sideways, as if reflecting off a mirror buried a fraction of a wavelength inside the rarer medium.
- Occurs under total internal reflection (θ > θc), where |reflection coefficient| = 1.
- Magnitude is on the order of the wavelength λ.
- Depends on polarization: TE (s) and TM (p) shifts differ.
The Mechanism: Evanescent Waves and the Reflection Phase
Under total internal reflection the transmitted field does not vanish — it becomes an evanescent wave that penetrates the rarer medium, decaying exponentially with depth over a scale d ≈ λ/(2π√(n²sin²θ − 1)), typically 100-300 nm. This wave carries energy parallel to the surface for a short distance before the light re-couples into the reflected beam, physically offsetting it.
Quantitatively, the reflection coefficient has unit magnitude but a nonzero phase δ(θ) that varies with angle. Karl Artmann showed in 1948 by a stationary-phase argument that each plane-wave component of the beam picks up a slightly different phase, and their superposition shifts the beam by
- D = -(λ/2π)·(dδ/dθ) = -(1/k)·(dδ/dθ), with k = 2π/λ the wavenumber.
The steeper the phase's angular slope, the larger the shift. Because the Fresnel phases for TE and TM light differ, so do their shifts — the hallmark of the GH effect.
Key Quantities and a Worked Example
For light going from a dense medium (index n) into vacuum/air, the total-internal-reflection phases are
- TE (s): δ_TE = -2·arctan(√(n²sin²θ − 1) / (n cosθ))
- TM (p): δ_TM = -2·arctan(n√(n²sin²θ − 1) / cosθ)
Feeding these into Artmann's formula gives the compact result
- D_TE = (λ/π) · tanθ / √(n²sin²θ − 1)
- D_TM = D_TE / (n²sin²θ − cos²θ)
Example. Take n = 1.5 (BK7 glass), λ = 633 nm (HeNe laser), critical angle θc ≈ 41.8°. At θ = 45°, n²sin²θ − 1 = 1.5²·0.5 − 1 = 0.125, so √(0.125) ≈ 0.354, tanθ = 1. Then D_TE = (633 nm/π)·(1/0.354) ≈ 569 nm — just under one wavelength. The TM shift is smaller: dividing by (n²sin²θ − cos²θ) = 1.125 − 0.5 = 0.625 gives D_TM ≈ 569/0.625 ≈ 910 nm here, because near the critical angle that denominator drops below 1 and boosts TM. As θ → θc the formula diverges, a known artifact resolved by finite-beam theories.
How It Is Observed and Applied
A single shift of ~500 nm is nearly impossible to see directly, so Goos and Hänchen used a clever trick: a beam that undergoes many successive total internal reflections inside a slab accumulates the shift N times. By comparing a totally reflecting region against a silver-coated strip (ordinary metallic reflection, no GH shift) on the same prism, they amplified a sub-micron effect into a measurable displacement of the exit spot, confirming Picht's 1929 prediction.
Modern detection is far more sensitive:
- Weak-value amplification uses nearly-crossed polarizers to magnify the polarization-dependent shift by factors of 10³-10⁴, resolving displacements of ångström scale.
- Position-sensitive detectors and interferometry track the beam centroid directly.
Applications exploit the shift's exquisite sensitivity to surface conditions: optical sensing and biosensing (a monolayer of adsorbed molecules changes the local index and thus D), surface-plasmon-resonance readouts, temperature and refractive-index metrology, and beam-steering in integrated photonics and waveguide couplers.
Comparison to Related Beam-Shift Phenomena
The Goos-Hänchen shift is one member of a family of non-specular reflection effects that arise because a real beam is not a single plane wave. Distinguishing them clarifies what GH is not:
- Imbert-Fedorov (IF) shift: a transverse displacement, perpendicular to the plane of incidence, driven by the spin-orbit interaction of light. It flips sign with the handedness of circular polarization, whereas GH lives entirely in the plane of incidence.
- Angular GH deviation: a slight change in beam direction (not position), governed by the gradient of the reflection amplitude rather than its phase; it becomes important right at the critical angle where partial transmission returns.
- Wigner / Hartman time delay: the temporal analogue, D_time = dδ/dω, the dwell time of the pulse in the evanescent region — the same phase-gradient idea applied to frequency instead of angle.
All share the stationary-phase mathematics; they differ in which variable (in-plane angle, polarization, or frequency) the reflection phase is differentiated against.
Significance, Open Questions, and Famous Cases
The Goos-Hänchen shift matters because it is a rare, tabletop manifestation of the evanescent wave — the same clinging near-field that underlies frustrated total internal reflection, optical tunneling, near-field microscopy, and the quantum-tunneling analogy. Isaac Newton anticipated a version of it in his 1704 Opticks, describing light appearing to "turn" before leaving a surface; it took 243 years for Goos and Hänchen to catch it.
The effect is genuinely universal. It has been observed not only for light but for microwaves, X-rays, acoustic and seismic waves, matter waves (neutrons, 2010), and electrons in graphene, where the GH shift at a p-n junction can reach tens of nanometers and is being explored for valley-tronic beam control.
- Negative and giant shifts: near surface-plasmon resonances or in metamaterials and photonic crystals, D can reverse sign or reach tens to hundreds of wavelengths.
- Open issue: the Artmann formula's divergence exactly at θc; finite-beam and Bessel-function treatments keep D finite, but the precise value at the critical angle remains subtle and depends on beam width.
| Effect | Displacement plane | Origin | Polarization behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goos-Hänchen (GH) | In plane of incidence (along surface) | dφ/dθ — angular gradient of reflection phase | D_TM = D_TE / (n²sin²θ − cos²θ) |
| Imbert-Fedorov (IF) | Perpendicular to plane of incidence (transverse) | Spin-orbit coupling of light; dφ/d(polarization) | Opposite sign for left/right circular polarization |
| Angular GH deviation | In-plane change of beam direction | Amplitude (not phase) gradient across beam | Vanishes deep inside TIR; grows near θc |
| Fresnel filtering | In-plane, curved interfaces | Angular reflectivity selecting sub-beams | Strong near critical angle on curved surfaces |
| Wigner time delay (temporal cousin) | Time, not space | dφ/dω — frequency gradient of phase | Both polarizations delayed on reflection |
Frequently asked questions
What is the Goos-Hänchen shift in simple terms?
It is the small sideways slip a light beam undergoes when it bounces off a surface by total internal reflection. Instead of reflecting exactly at the point where it hits, the beam re-emerges displaced along the surface by roughly one wavelength (about half a micrometer for visible light). The offset is in the plane of incidence and does not change the beam's direction.
Why does the Goos-Hänchen shift happen?
During total internal reflection the light does not stop abruptly at the interface. An evanescent wave penetrates a fraction of a wavelength into the rarer medium and travels forward along the surface before the energy re-couples into the reflected beam. Mathematically, each plane-wave component of the beam acquires a slightly different reflection phase δ(θ); summing them via stationary phase shifts the beam by D = -(λ/2π)·(dδ/dθ).
What is the Artmann formula for the Goos-Hänchen shift?
Karl Artmann derived it in 1948 using a stationary-phase argument: D = -(1/k)·(dδ/dθ), where k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber and δ(θ) is the phase of the Fresnel reflection coefficient. For TE polarization at total internal reflection this gives D_TE = (λ/π)·tanθ/√(n²sin²θ − 1). The formula diverges at the critical angle, which finite-beam theories correct.
How big is the Goos-Hänchen shift?
It is on the order of one wavelength — typically 0.1 to 1 μm for visible light. For example, a 633 nm HeNe beam in n = 1.5 glass at 45° incidence shifts by about 570 nm for TE polarization. Because a single shift is so small, Goos and Hänchen amplified it in 1947 by using many successive reflections inside a slab.
How is the Goos-Hänchen shift different from the Imbert-Fedorov shift?
The Goos-Hänchen shift is longitudinal — it lies in the plane of incidence, along the surface — and comes from the angular gradient of the reflection phase. The Imbert-Fedorov shift is transverse — perpendicular to the plane of incidence — and arises from the spin-orbit interaction of light, flipping sign with the handedness of circular polarization. Both are non-specular beam shifts but act in perpendicular directions.
Does the Goos-Hänchen shift depend on polarization?
Yes. TE (s-polarized) and TM (p-polarized) light experience different shifts because their Fresnel reflection phases differ. The relation is D_TM = D_TE / (n²sin²θ − cos²θ). Near the critical angle that denominator falls below 1, making the TM shift larger; far from it the TM shift becomes smaller. This polarization difference is a defining signature of the effect and is exploited in weak-value amplification sensing.